Hot Spring Lake Found On Mars, Sept 2014, UFO Sighting News.

Date of discovery: Sept 18, 2014
Location of discovery: Chryse Planitia, Mars
Source NASA photo:
Photo ID: PIA14462

I found water on Mars again and this time is a @#$# load of it. A whole hot spring lake on Mars. This photo is the original color that NASA put on their site and nothing has been altered, nor did NASA say they changed anything on it. Its all original. This is amazing and there are a lot of ancient structures all alone the edges of the lake. I didn’t see the cones NASA was talking about and I believe this photo was put up by accident. It may be taken down soon, so copy it to your computer before they delete it from their site…yes, they have used info at my site to do that before! SCW


27 Comments on “Hot Spring Lake Found On Mars, Sept 2014, UFO Sighting News.”

  1. This is the view of a HiRISE image with infrared color. There is not water. The sand contains unoxidized iron, which appears blue, while the rest of the surface (in this image) is covered by oxidized iron-bearing dust which appears orange-grayish.

  2. man the magic mushrooms must be strong in the usa.that or your smoking those usa made leagle highs

  3. ok mayby is  water but is no drinkyable so what good is it? also it probably salted water ,wohoo drink that!

  4. Sigh, it's called a false colour image, NASA uses them to help distinguish between different shades of red.
    Also, water boils away on the surface of mars due to the extremely low pressure so your hot spring cannot exist.
    This is all very basic science, 5th grade stuff.

  5. Before you say this is likely to be water, surely you must, at the very least, be able to demonstrate CONCLUSIVELY that the image shows the original colouration and is not merely the result of some false-colour image processing – no?   Otherwise you are simply fooling yourself, and falling into the trap of believing (what are beliefs but unverified assumptions about reality) rather than knowing. If you propose the hypothesis that this image depicts the edge of a lake (reasonable enough taken at face value) then it's incumbent upon you to do your utmost to disprove the 'false-colour' explanation otherwise it's all just 'much ado about nothing' isn't it?

  6. MINUS 89 degrees Fahrenheit. There can not be a water in liquid on the surface. Mars has NO thermal anything including volcanoes. This is complete crap just what are you talking about there is no volcanic thermal anywhere on mars.

  7. What did you learn from presenting this picture that way Scott? I am curious…

  8. jimmy how do you know that pressure on mars is very low nasa told you believe them ? maybe is 0.7 bar?

  9. Compared to the landmass to the right, the water do seem to demonstrate ocean wave patterns heading to the coastal land mass if looked closely, & yes i do believe there's water on mars & is a livable & breathable environment that earth humans can breath in w/ out oxygen devices, the Sec Gov & GRB are not going to tell the world this & why simple, these two orgs want to set up shop secretly on mars & the moon & secretly mine the two worlds that is if the pwrfull ET host on those worlds who's really callin the shots up there allows them to imo.

  10. Dude, total bullshit what you're saying! They would have made that the premiere feature picture when they announced the water discovery a few days ago! Get outta town!

  11. Total rubbish! The conditions on Mars can not sustain such large amounts of liquid surface water. But I don't blame you for spreading false information because you are just a sad loser. I blame Youtube for allowing you to put such nonsense here in the first place.

  12. "Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and confirm it" . . . . . There's no body of water that size on Mars, do they not teach geography or basic physics in schools in America ?

  13. You don't "wait" for the authorities to tell you "the truth."  You weigh the evidence and make up your OWN mind.

  14. more nashole garbage for the gullible ones to eat up….but yes, it's a real fake image, not a fake fake image.

  15. So if it is a hot spring then where is the steam? You mention steam on a comparison as well. I hope you don't have a job as a teacher.

  16. If You would know anything about mars, it can't hold water on small amounts like mud wich was found in 2015

  17. I'm looking through NASAs Photo journal Target: Mars, Mission: MRO, Spacecraft: MRO, Instrument: HiRISE and PIA14462 no longer seems to be in the database.

  18. We do have photographic evidence to debate on. However as far as atmospheric data is concerned, for myself that's up in the air, (pun intended). The basis for my doubt about the true conditions of the atmospheric conditions of mars are the many amateur global photos of mars showing a much more bluish and thicker atmosphere than most of the official releases from nasa. You would think that a spectral analysis of the many amateur photos (some are even time-lapsed to show rotation) would reveal stats different from what nasa claims are the basic conditions of the martian atmosphere. (Someone needs to do that work, it may already be done) Besides that, what natural accumulations of materials, including shadows aside (that explanation has is even more difficult to reconcile), would fill a depression in the very shape of the main part of that depression, better than liquids, in this context? Why also would there be such variations on the bottom of that crater like depression, which look like dunes and other solid geological features, yet that so called false blue, conforms perfectly to circular contours of that crater like depression? The lack of (I can't see it maybe someone else could) color variation that might show a change in water depth, does concern me. But you have to pick the best material to explain what you're seeing with your own eyes, in the context of where you're seeing it. If you can come up with more plausible explanation, do tell. Shoot and I didn't even get into all the right angle type stuff he was seeing outside of the crater.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.