48 Comments on “THE SECRET STORY OF APOLLO 16 – The Moon, Men and Memories – FEATURE”

  1. To all of you who thought we didn't go to the moon and thought it was filmed. Go make an hour long film about 2 astronauts landing on a moon.

    Most possible answer: "yeah here's the link it's called we never went to the moon" is 100%

  2. I bet Charlie Duke and John Young are having a chuckle! As I mentioned before, millions of folks watched the Launches live a few miles away, they felt the ground shake beneath their feet. How and why would you fake that? Truth is a lot of Americans got off their arses to make sure Kennedy's challenge was met, after his untimely death. I call that honourable and patriotic. ..and I'm a European. Back then Americans had a purpose and balls. Saying it's all fake is like saying the ancient Egyptians couldn't possibly have built the pyramids without alien help. It's disrespectful and just plain dumb.

  3. Who told the NASA operations crew to bring cigars with them for that day they solved the Apollo 13 oxygen tank explosion problems?

  4. 32:34 Who is shooting them? The camera moves from left to right and keeps astronauts in focus, so who is operating the camera?

  5. Once again an interesting & informative documentary has been ruined by far too many stupid fucking adverts. For this reason I'm not viewing any more of this video. I am sick to high heaven of these bastard adverts. Hate them with a passion for infringing on my enjoyment. Not good. Every few minutes 'another' fucking advert rears it's fucking head – well fucking NO THANK YOU !!

  6. A nice review of a successful mission from initial training, through liftoff to splash down. Since it calls itself "the secret story" there are some revelations, such as the fact that the astronauts found Saturn V liftoff to be pretty frightening, and John Young's admission that many things went wrong on the mission, yet they were able to get around them all. Generally, NASA presented the successful missions as running pretty smoothly, but that was not the case. One thing that is not mentioned is what Ken Mattingly told Andrew Chaikin in Chaikin's book "A Man on the Moon" regarding the serious problem with the back-up Service Module engine controls…..the official story is that after extensive simulation and analysis, the problem was not considered to be serious. However, Mattingly told Chaikin that he would not have made that decision. Fortunately, everything worked out in the end.

  7. TELL ME THIS: AT 30MINS & 36 SEC, THIS DOC SHOWS THE COMMAND MODULE FLOATING IN SPACE AS IT ROUNDS THE MOON, & WHERE THE OTHER GUYS ARE ON THE SURFACE OF THE MOON with the landing module ( right ) THE LANDING MODULE WILL BLAST OFF TO REJOIN THE COMMAND MODULE. RIGHT ?!! SO WHAT OR WHO WAS TAKING THE VIDEO OF THE COMMAND MODULE AS IT WAS FLOATING THRU SPACE ??? THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE A SEPARATE 3RD MODULE THAT WAS FILMING THE COMMAND MODULE. I DONT KNOW IF MAN WENT TO THE MOON CAUSE I WASNT THERE AND I CANT GO PROVE OR DISPROVE. HOWEVER I DO UNDERSTAND THAT BECAUSE OF LOW GRAVITATIONAL PULL, THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALOT OF DUST FLYING AROUND FROM THE LANDING AND PEOPLE JUMPING AROUND, EVEN ON EARTH DUST FLYS WHEN A JET TYPE ENGINE IGNITES, AND PUSH THRUST, THERE HAS TO BE DUST AND THE MOONDUST SHOULD TAKE LONGER TO SETTLE , UNLESS THEY ARE SAYING THAT MOONDUST IS HEAVIER THAN EARTH DUST. JUST EXPLAIN THAT .  NOT ENOUGH DIRT AND DUST FLOATING, PERIOD.

  8. all this is a big bullshit…..! for a tiny electrical car of today 2017 then 1970's you cannot get more then 200 kilometers……and still very very heavy and very very big the sizes of the batteries…….! where in that rocket you see the SPACE TO PUT THAT ROVER…….? WHERE IS THE ROVER …..? don't give me that bullshit please ……👎

  9. "The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." — Dr. James Van Allen

  10. Chinese foreign minister Wang sayed (all the conspiracy theories about america faking Apollo missions are true we the glorious people of china are rewriting history and putting the record straight

  11. I am amazed of they plastic anti radiation shealds. Today they need 10 years for Orion project to make working shields.

  12. just point the scopes to the landers and prove it once and for all ,that's all they need to do .hoax settled. get the proper scientist and news media to oversee it and its done ,cause after all they had to land on the sunlit side that points to earth full time , problem solved….wouldn't take up just more than an hour ,they could do it easy as apple pie. I maby be a moon hoaxer but I know they went to low orbit but that don't mean they went to the moon , 2 people don't make it true and never will .they could prove it in the new world if they wanted too, but they seem so elusive for such a small problem and that's where the boundaries are drawn and the skeptics are born.god bless the united states

  13. Astronaut John Young's comment–about how, a) the sight of the earth from space really brought home our oneness as a race (the human race) and, b) that only God can help us achieve that oneness–is telling.  Baha'u'llah, Prophet-Founder of the Baha'i Faith said, "the earth is but one country and mankind its citizens".  Baha'is believe that world peace and unity will happen inevitably; that it is God's plan.  How soon?  That's the variable!  However, the good news is that it will happen sooner or later.

  14. I watch the first moon landing im in Sydney Ausrtalia and we watched Buzz Aldrin kick a coke bottle across the moon surface then when they put the rerun up it wasnt there so yes i watched the hoax moon landings for sure

  15. back in the 60's we believed we would be holidaying on the moon by the year 2000, it never happened, all that time in low earth orbit could have also continued with lunar landings augmented from a space station in orbit, wishful thinking!

  16. Why the name calling why is it a crime to simply ask questions ? I can see flaws in both sides of the debate and I can also see evidence that can support either/both hypotheses.

  17. Those who still believe that we landed on the moon are those who benefited from the program, believe in American exceptionalism, blind believers in science and technology and know very little about major facts that prevented NASA sending men to the moon. There were no successful tests of the Lunar Module landing on Earth. Armstrong almost died trying. There was no successful test of the space suits in vacuum. A man almost died trying. There is vacuum on the moon; to survive for days in vacuum on the moon could not be possible in those flimsy suits. They would've leaked like a sieve or even blown up. The temperatures on the moon's sunny side is around 100 degrees Celsius, the boiling point of water. The cooling system in the suits could not have been adequate with the small amount of water and the small battery in them. What charged the batteries? What material was used in their boots to protect them from the hot soil? How did the astronauts don their bulky suits in a small space where there was little room even without the space suit? They needed help even here on Earth to put them on. Long term exposure to space radiation of humans including the Van Allen belt were overlooked. The suits didn't provide protection according to the manufacturers. How could they frolic like kids, falling on the surface of the moon with so much danger around them? Why did they have to monkey around with their Lunar buggies and travel ten or so miles from their LM and relative safety? What could they find that they couldn't a couple of hundred feet from it? What if the Rover broke down miles from the LM? Would they have time to walk back? Was it irresponsible by NASA to risk their lives? What if they had died there? Would we be looking at the moon with dead American astronauts forever? How did they defecate and urinate in their space suit? How did they clean it up? How could NASA be so confident to send six flawless missions to the moon? Well, they were confident that those embarrassments wouldn't happen because they didn't send them there, they faked it!

  18. i was 8 when the eagle landed and for me and many of my generation this was an era of lofty dreams and hopes to touch the stars, though public interest had largely waned by Apollo 14, the later missions were actually far more interesting and we suspect much covert activity went on behind the scene, and it is good to see details of the 16 mission analysed here
    some may claim they faked the whole thing and the cries of hoax will resound for a long time too come but personally (based upon quite extensive study of the whole program) i feel they did go there and we got to see only a sanitised part of the actual event and part of an earth based reenactment that would be shown to the world whilst the real astronauts carried out activity deemed too sensitive for our eyes,

  19. Why isn't the UFO community not more amazed and excited about the Apollo 20 footage. It is amazing and people are hardly discussing it. Watch the footage people it's on YouTube. I challenge anyone to try and recreate that footage simply amazing!!!!

  20. @29:12 have to say that the earth is further away from
    the moon than than the moon is fro the earth. The earth looks smaller than the moon does at that distance. Earth should appear 2/3 bigger than the moon appears in our own sky. Not seeing it here. What I do see is a fake horizon doctored in censoring everything in the background.

  21. οι αστροναύτες πηδούν ενώ το αυτοκίνητο μένει κολλημένο στην άμμο χα χα χα

  22. Being on a UFO channel I thought they would mention while driving the Rover and Houston asking why they deviated on the way back to the LM. John Young replied “we had to go around Rebecca.” That and maybe Charlie Duke asking John Young, “Hey John, are these your footprints? No.” There’s another example but can’t recall.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *