What Luis Elizondo got very wrong about the UFO videos in his book “Imminent: Inside the Pentagon’s Hunt for UFOs”
Reference:
Gimbal Analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsEjV8DdSbs
GoFast Analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLyEO0jNt6M (no including wind)
FLIR1 (Tic-Tac) motion analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1di0XIa9RQ
Aguadilla Analysis: https://youtu.be/0fho4YyXWfE?t=86
Raw videos:
On April 27, the US Navy released official versions of these three UFO videos. All videos are the same length as older versions. FLIR1 is slightly higher bitrate than the TTSA version, but worse quality than the 2007 F4 version, even though F4 is lower resolution. GOFAST and GIMBAL videos are the same resolution at double the bitrate, which is significantly better. These versions of GIMBAL and GOFAST should be used for all future analyses, however, for FLIR, the 2007 leaked F4.MPG version via archive.org appears to be better quality.
Here are the direct links
https://www.navair.navy.mil/foia/sites/g/files/jejdrs566/files/2020-04/1 – FLIR.mp4
https://www.navair.navy.mil/foia/sites/g/files/jejdrs566/files/2020-04/3 – GOFAST.wmv
https://www.navair.navy.mil/foia/sites/g/files/jejdrs566/files/2020-04/2 – GIMBAL.wmv
This is the originally leaked FLIR1, which is better quality than the Navy version.
https://web.archive.org/web/20070209104330/http://www.vision-unlimited.de/extern/f4.mpg
High quality MP4s
https://www.metabunk.org/f/3-GOFAST-CROP-HQ.mp4 (used in Sitrec)
A slightly better crop of converted to MP4 video, no blank frames at the start (Used in Sitrec)
https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec-videos/public/2 – Gimbal-WMV2PRORES-CROP-428×428.mp4
FLIR1 aspect ratio corrected to 242×242 (was 242×216) (used in Sitrec)
Summarize this content to 100 words [matched_content]
source
What Luis Elizondo got very wrong about the UFO videos.
46575 , 2024-08-21 23:32:33 , 00:12:36
UCF3UCTZiVg9wrIEzO7Om6jw
2846
[vid_tags]